the clash of the titans


The very proof of a tir­ing week is that I am 5 days late in post­ing this blog. Two of my sport­ing heroes were clash­ing and given the fact that they belong to two dif­fer­ent eras, this could be pos­si­ble only on a exhi­bi­tion match 4 years after Pete Sam­pras bid his adieu to world of pro­fes­sional ten­nis. I still remem­ber his last defeat at Wim­ble­don in hands of Roger Fed­erer that brought an end to a streak of seven unbe­liev­able title vic­to­ries. He had cried, as he often did on court. He could just man­age to win one more US Open Title in 2002 and that was it for him. Peo­ple had already started ques­tion­ing his con­sis­tency, capac­ity and fitness.


I did not think much of the 3 exhi­bi­tion matches Fed and Pete were going to play. I will admit that I did not for once think Sam­pras had a chance and I am pretty sure 99% peo­ple did not either. But the leg­end showed that he can never be writ­ten off. He is so truly a cham­pion. Swiss took the first match in 2 sets in an hr. Sam­pras did play com­mend­ably and brought back the mem­o­ries of his reign­ing era. In the sec­ond match, he car­ried off win­ners after win­ners and left his oppo­nent try­ing hard to earn every point. Both sets went to tie breaks. Even this would have been enough for the fans like me who had been miss­ing his fierce serve and vol­leys since 90s. But he had some­thing else in mind, he wouldn’t go with­out a vic­tory. In Macao on Nov 24th, he stunned his 10 years junior, pre­vail­ing world no. 1 and the Swiss hero — Roger Fed­erer in a 7–6, 6–4 match. And it was not that Swiss did not put his best, but the cham­pion was bet­tered by the vet­eran. This is the most excit­ing news I have read in past few months. I still find it so bewil­der­ing that Sam­pras can pull such a per­for­mance at his age. He is just the BEST!!


I would also admit that I have been one of the believ­ers that Fed­erer might be actu­ally bet­ter than Sam­pras (as peo­ple have been argu­ing over and over again) but hell, no! Sam­pras is the all time leg­end and undoubt­edly so now. In his era, he had bet­ter rivals than what Fed­erer is hav­ing. If you read about his life his­tory a bit, you’ll be amazed at the kind of vic­to­ries he has had. I am not at all say­ing that Roger Fed­erer is not good any­more but lets not really com­pare. Sam­pras is Federer’s idol — and this says it all. One would never really know who is bet­ter because they would never com­pete at top of their careers. Fed­erer is the emperor and he IS going to break Sampras’s record. There is noth­ing that can be picked on him. He is going to be on all the record books and he deserves it completely.


But, I am just miss­ing the Sam­pras era…those late night matches on TV that I watched in my stu­dent life. His unex­am­pled rivalry with Agassi, that 4 set 7–6, 7–6, 7–6, 7–6 US Open 2001 semi final match, his unnerv­ing deter­mi­na­tion, his aces on sec­ond serves, his pierc­ing fore­hands, the way he cried on court after win­ning his 7th Wim­ble­don and 13th career title, his heart-wrenching defeat in Wim­ble­don in 2001.…his final bye at the US Open…


God just doesn’t make them like him anymore…


Damn, only if I could see him play live ever…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter

Related posts:

  1. Net­jets show­down — a dream watch
  2. For­get the West Indies, lets move to Roland Garros
  3. Fed­erer moves past Novak in Monte Carlo 2008
  4. Fed­erer suc­cumbs, Nadal wins singes and dou­bles at Monte Carlo 2008
  5. The world revolves around RF
This entry was posted in tennis and tagged federer, sampras. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting