Orwell’s writing

Barely 1/5th into ‘1984’, I cant help dis­cern­ing a fine indi­vid­u­al­is­tic touch of the author in the impact it suc­ceeds in gen­er­at­ing. Eric Arthur Blair aka George Orwell needs no intro­duc­tion.
What makes a piece engag­ing is often the views pre­sented behind the scenes (apart from the magic that authors like Wode­house can cre­ate by mere word­play) and for that, it is very impor­tant that the author says some­thing defin­i­tive rather than fill­ing pages with super­fi­cial frill. That is fea­si­ble only if the author holds a clear-cut view on the topic. Orwell exactly does that in Ani­mal Farm and 1984, and draw­ing upon his per­sonal expe­ri­ences, spins out cat­e­gor­i­cal tales woven around his ide­ol­ogy of pol­i­tics and soci­ety.

Wikipedia’s arti­cle on Orwell is an inter­est­ing read. I par­tic­u­larly liked the excerpt about his cri­tique of Dick­ens that only a blessed writer can conjure–

He wrote in the con­clu­sion to his 1940 essay on Charles Dick­ens, “When one reads any strongly indi­vid­ual piece of writ­ing, one has the impres­sion of see­ing a face some­where behind the page. It is not nec­es­sar­ily the actual face of the writer. I feel this very strongly with Swift, with Defoe, with Field­ing, Stend­hal, Thack­eray, Flaubert, though in sev­eral cases I do not know what these peo­ple looked like and do not want to know. What one sees is the face that the writer ought to have. Well, in the case of Dick­ens I see a face that is not quite the face of Dickens’s pho­tographs, though it resem­bles it. It is the face of a man of about forty, with a small beard and a high colour. He is laugh­ing, with a touch of anger in his laugh­ter, but no tri­umph, no malig­nity. It is the face of a man who is always fight­ing against some­thing, but who fights in the open and is not fright­ened, the face of a man who is gen­er­ously angry — in other words, of a nineteenth-century lib­eral, a free intel­li­gence, a type hated with equal hatred by all the smelly lit­tle ortho­dox­ies which are now con­tend­ing for our souls.

George Wood­cock sug­gested that the last two sen­tences char­ac­ter­ized Orwell as much as his subject.

The lovers of his works and his style of writ­ing will prob­a­bly also enjoy these “rules” he out­lined for writers -

In “Pol­i­tics and the Eng­lish Lan­guage,” George Orwell pro­vides six rules for writers:

  • Never use a metaphor, sim­ile, or other fig­ure of speech which you are used to see­ing in print.
  • Never use a long word where a short one will do.
  • If it is pos­si­ble to cut a word out, always cut it out.
  • Never use the pas­sive voice where you can use the active.
  • Never use a for­eign phrase, a sci­en­tific word, or a jar­gon word if you can think of an every­day Eng­lish equivalent.
  • Break any of these rules sooner than say any­thing out­right barbarous.
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter

Related posts:

  1. Orwell’s essay on P G Wodehouse
This entry was posted in favorites, literature, miscellaneous and tagged books, orwell. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting